Landmark misclassification settlement: Uber and Lyft agree to $175 million resolution in US lawsuit
In a historic legal resolution, rideshare company Uber Technologies and Lyft Inc. have agreed to a $175 million settlement with the state of Massachusetts. This landmark agreement addresses the ongoing issue of misclassifying drivers as independent contractors instead of employees and could have profound implications for contractor compliance across the industry.
The lawsuit explained
The state of Massachusetts initiated the lawsuit by asserting that Uber and Lyft's misclassification of drivers resulted in the denial of appropriate employee benefits, leading to underpayment. The state argued that these drivers met the criteria for employee status under Massachusetts law, entitling them to corresponding benefits and protections.
The settlement, which concludes this contentious legal battle, involves Uber and Lyft paying $148 million and $27 million, respectively. This financial restitution is designed to compensate current and former drivers affected by the misclassification.
Beyond the financial compensation, the settlement also mandates substantial improvements in driver benefits. For the first time in Massachusetts, Uber and Lyft drivers are to be guaranteed a minimum wage of $32.50 per hour. Additional benefits include paid sick leave, occupational accident insurance, and healthcare stipends, significantly enhancing the working conditions and financial security of rideshare drivers.
Industry-wide implications
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell praised the settlement as a triumph for accountability and driver welfare. "Today’s agreement holds Uber and Lyft accountable and provides their drivers, for the first time in Massachusetts, guaranteed minimum pay, paid sick leave, occupational accident insurance, and healthcare stipends," she stated.
The settlement also requires Uber and Lyft to enhance transparency by providing drivers with more information about their trips before they accept them. This includes details on trip length, final destination, and expected earnings. Additional protections include measures to prevent discrimination or retaliation against drivers and the provision of in-app chat support in multiple languages.
| Aspect | Employee | Independent Contractor |
|---|---|---|
| Control and supervision | Direct control over how, when, and where to work | Freedom to set their own schedules and methods |
| Payment | Regular wages; taxes withheld by employer | Paid per project; responsible for their own taxes |
| Benefits | Health insurance, retirment plans, paid leave | Must arrange their own benefits |
| Termination | Often requires notice and may include severance | Can usually be terminated at any time without benefits |
| Tools and equipment | Provided by the employer | Typically use their own tools |
.png)
.png)
Regulatory and legislative context
This settlement also puts an end to a potential ballot measure supported by Uber and Lyft, which would have asked Massachusetts voters to decide whether rideshare drivers should remain classified as independent contractors. However, a union-backed ballot measure that could allow drivers to unionise and collectively bargain remains unaffected by this settlement.
A broader trend in the US gig economy
This settlement is part of a larger trend of legal challenges faced by companies regarding classification of workers. For instance, Uber settled a similar lawsuit in California last year, paying $8.44 million over misclassification claims. These settlements underscore the ongoing legal and regulatory challenges in defining the employment status of gig economy workers and come off the back of the US Department of Labor (DoL) redefining the rules around independent contractors.
Looking ahead
The Massachusetts settlement represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over the rights and classifications of gig economy workers. It sets a precedent for how gig economy workers might be treated in other jurisdictions and highlights the evolving complexity of employment laws in the digital age and the growing need for companies to have a global contractor compliance solution in place.
This is where YunoJuno can help. By classifying contractors with integrated tools and automation, your business can hire faster, compliantly and with peace of mind on a global scale. In a case where a worker is misclassified, YunoJuno takes the compliance responsibility to protect your business. Find out more about compliance with YunoJuno and download our Misclassification Checklist.
.png)
